Current racial disparities in STEM degree attainment threaten America’s ability to be globally competitive. As the need for a more diverse STEM workforce persists, faculty leadership at many Historically Black Universities and Colleges (HBCUs) continue to support, nurture and prepare the next generation of diverse scientists to meet the demands of the 21st century. However, messages of Black student intellectual inferiority are salient in society, perpetuated by widespread emphasis on the achievement gap and low representation in STEM. Believing that intelligence can be developed through effective effort, resources and support—growth mindset—has been found to support positive student outcomes and to mitigate the negative effects of stereotypes leading to increased achievement, particularly for Black students. To date, mindsets have not been examined through the lens of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and the four frames of academic leadership. Therefore, this qualitative study examines the experiences of 13 students and 17 faculty members at 4 HBCUs and their perspectives on their STEM programs. The analysis of focus group data suggests that student fixed mindsets may deter students from persisting as STEM majors while faculty growth mindset and support, which fall within the human resources frame of leadership, can help to mitigate those effects. Implications for HBCU leaders are discussed.
Published in | American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12 |
Page(s) | 110-119 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Mindsets, Higher Education Leadership, HBCU, Broadening Participation in STEM
[1] | Boykin, A. W., & Noguera, P. (2011). Creating the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the achivement gap. ASCD. |
[2] | Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4734 |
[3] | Gasman, M. (2013). The changing face of historically black colleges and universities. Penngse Center for MSI, 1-18. |
[4] | Toldson, I. A. (2019). Cultivating STEM Talent at Minority Serving Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities to Broaden Participation in STEM at Historically Black Colleges and Universities [Chapter]. ACS Symposium Series, 1328, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1328.ch001 |
[5] | Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Green, D. J., Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2020). Does My Professor Think My Ability Can Change? Students’ Perceptions of Their STEM Professors’ Mindset Beliefs Predict Their Psychological Vulnerability, Engagement, and Performance in Class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000763 |
[6] | Saphier, J. (2016). High expectations teaching: How we persuade students to believe and act on "smart is something you can get.”. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. |
[7] | Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet–Simon Intelligence Scale. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin. |
[8] | Bell, D. (1987). And we are not saved: the elusive quest for racial justice. New York, Basic Books. |
[9] | Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2012). Critical race theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: NYU Press. |
[10] | Ladson-Billings, G. & Tate, W. (1995) Toward a critical race theory of education, Teachers College Record, 97 (1), 47–68. |
[11] | Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C., Delgado, R. & Crenshaw, K. (Eds) (1993) Words that wound: critical race theory, assaultive speech and the first amendment (Boulder, CO, Westview Press). |
[12] | Harris, A. (2012). Foreword. In R. Delgado & J. Stafancic, Critical race theory: An introduction (pp. xvii -xxi). (2nd ed.). New York: NYU Press. |
[13] | Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K. (2005). And we are still not saved: Critical race theory in education ten years later. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8 (1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000340971 |
[14] | Gasman, M. (2007). “Swept under the Rug? A Historiography of Gender and Black Colleges.” American Educational Research Journal. 44 (4): 760–805. |
[15] | Upton, R., & Tanenbaum, C. (2014). The Role of Historically Black Colleges and Universities as Pathway Providers: Institutional Pathways to the STEM PhD Among Black Students. Broadening Partcipation in STEM Graduate Education, 2010 (September), 1–12. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctorates/. |
[16] | Eno, V. (2019). Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Education of Marginalized Populations. 60–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7787-4.ch003 |
[17] | National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. National Science Foundation. (2013). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Baccalaureate Origins of U.S.-trained S&E Doctorate Recipients. Arlington, VA (NSF 13-323). |
[18] | Gasman, M., & Samayoa, A. C. (2017). Historically Black colleges and universities: Fostering familial learning environments for student success. Retrieved from https://www.higheredtoday.org/2017/10/04/historically-black-colleges-universities-fostering-familial-learning-environments-student-success/. Accessed 9 January 2021. |
[19] | The Education Trust. (2010) College Results Online. North Carolina & Mississippi institutional data. The Education Trust. (2017) College Results Online. |
[20] | Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1991). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
[21] | Bolman, L., & Gallos, J. (2011). Reframing academic leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
[22] | Clark, S. L., & Lindahl, R. A. (2014). University Council for Educational Administration. |
[23] | Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House. |
[24] | Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78 (1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x |
[25] | Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. American Psychological Association, 95, 256-273. |
[26] | Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 |
[27] | Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24 (6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002 |
[28] | Yeager, D. S., Dahl, R. E., & Dweck, C. S. (2018). Why interventions to influence adolescent behavior often fail but could succeed. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 101–122. |
[29] | Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-Set Interventions Are a Scalable Treatment for Academic Underachievement. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017 |
[30] | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
[31] | Murphy, M., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization‘s lay theory shapes people‘s cognition, affect and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 283-296. doi: 10.1177/0146167209347380. |
[32] | Dai, T., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39 (3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003 |
[33] | Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok - Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012 |
[34] | Bandura, A. (Ed.) (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[35] | U.S. Department of Education. (2018). The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). National Center for Education Statistics. STEM course taking. April, 1–12. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/ |
[36] | Rodriguez, A. (2018). Inequity by Design? Aligning High School Math Offerings and Public Flagship College Entrance Requirements. Journal of Higher Education, 89 (2), 153-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1341757 |
[37] | Toldson, I., & Lewis, C. (2012). Public reciprocity in education for postsecondary success (PREPS) for students of color: The legal justification and a call for action (Editor’s commentary). The Journal of Negro Education, 81, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.1.0001 |
[38] | McGlynn, T. (2020). The Chicago Guide to College Science Teaching. University of Chicago Press. |
[39] | Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., Brady, S. T., Akcinar, E. N., Paunesku, D., Keane, L., Kamentz, D., Ritter, G., Duckworth, A. L., Urstein, R., Gomez, E. M., Markus, H. R., Cohen, G. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (24), E3341–E3348. |
[40] | American Institutes for Research. (2012). Broadening participation in STEM: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author. |
[41] | Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering. (2019). Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering 2017-2018 Biennial Report to Congress: Investigating in Diverse Community Voices. https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/CEOSE_ReportToCongress_RP_FVmp_508.Pdf |
[42] | National Science Foundation. (2019). National Science Board, Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020. NSB-2019-7. HBCU Enrollment Rates component. Alexandria, VA. |
APA Style
Afiya Fredericks, Kimarie Engerman, Camille McKayle McKayle. (2021). Providing the Opportunity to Learn: Unpacking the Role of Mindsets and Leadership in Broadening Participation in STEM at HBCUs. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 10(5), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12
ACS Style
Afiya Fredericks; Kimarie Engerman; Camille McKayle McKayle. Providing the Opportunity to Learn: Unpacking the Role of Mindsets and Leadership in Broadening Participation in STEM at HBCUs. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 10(5), 110-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12
AMA Style
Afiya Fredericks, Kimarie Engerman, Camille McKayle McKayle. Providing the Opportunity to Learn: Unpacking the Role of Mindsets and Leadership in Broadening Participation in STEM at HBCUs. Am J Appl Psychol. 2021;10(5):110-119. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12, author = {Afiya Fredericks and Kimarie Engerman and Camille McKayle McKayle}, title = {Providing the Opportunity to Learn: Unpacking the Role of Mindsets and Leadership in Broadening Participation in STEM at HBCUs}, journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology}, volume = {10}, number = {5}, pages = {110-119}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20211005.12}, abstract = {Current racial disparities in STEM degree attainment threaten America’s ability to be globally competitive. As the need for a more diverse STEM workforce persists, faculty leadership at many Historically Black Universities and Colleges (HBCUs) continue to support, nurture and prepare the next generation of diverse scientists to meet the demands of the 21st century. However, messages of Black student intellectual inferiority are salient in society, perpetuated by widespread emphasis on the achievement gap and low representation in STEM. Believing that intelligence can be developed through effective effort, resources and support—growth mindset—has been found to support positive student outcomes and to mitigate the negative effects of stereotypes leading to increased achievement, particularly for Black students. To date, mindsets have not been examined through the lens of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and the four frames of academic leadership. Therefore, this qualitative study examines the experiences of 13 students and 17 faculty members at 4 HBCUs and their perspectives on their STEM programs. The analysis of focus group data suggests that student fixed mindsets may deter students from persisting as STEM majors while faculty growth mindset and support, which fall within the human resources frame of leadership, can help to mitigate those effects. Implications for HBCU leaders are discussed.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Providing the Opportunity to Learn: Unpacking the Role of Mindsets and Leadership in Broadening Participation in STEM at HBCUs AU - Afiya Fredericks AU - Kimarie Engerman AU - Camille McKayle McKayle Y1 - 2021/10/12 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12 T2 - American Journal of Applied Psychology JF - American Journal of Applied Psychology JO - American Journal of Applied Psychology SP - 110 EP - 119 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5672 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20211005.12 AB - Current racial disparities in STEM degree attainment threaten America’s ability to be globally competitive. As the need for a more diverse STEM workforce persists, faculty leadership at many Historically Black Universities and Colleges (HBCUs) continue to support, nurture and prepare the next generation of diverse scientists to meet the demands of the 21st century. However, messages of Black student intellectual inferiority are salient in society, perpetuated by widespread emphasis on the achievement gap and low representation in STEM. Believing that intelligence can be developed through effective effort, resources and support—growth mindset—has been found to support positive student outcomes and to mitigate the negative effects of stereotypes leading to increased achievement, particularly for Black students. To date, mindsets have not been examined through the lens of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and the four frames of academic leadership. Therefore, this qualitative study examines the experiences of 13 students and 17 faculty members at 4 HBCUs and their perspectives on their STEM programs. The analysis of focus group data suggests that student fixed mindsets may deter students from persisting as STEM majors while faculty growth mindset and support, which fall within the human resources frame of leadership, can help to mitigate those effects. Implications for HBCU leaders are discussed. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -